
|
B. Issues in registration 1.
Who owns the trademark?
A
threshold issue in the application process concerns the identity of the party
or parties that own the trademark or service mark. A trademark may be owned by
an individual or a juristic person, which includes corporations, partnerships,
joint ventures, unions, associations and other organizations capable of suing
and being sued in a court of law. The application must be made only by the
owner of the mark or by the person or entity that has a
bona
fide
intention to use the mark in commerce.
Although
the identity of the owner of a mark is usually fairly clear in the case of an
individual or corporation, ownership by a musical group is problematic. A
trademark application is usually filed in the name of a single party, because,
historically, ownership by more than one party appears to contradict the
function of a trademark to indicate a single source. However, joint
applicants, such as some or all of the individual members of a musical group,
may be allowed provided that the mark and the business in which it is used are
in fact owned by separate parties jointly and cannot be identified correctly in
any other way. Of course, if it is decided that all members of a musical group
will be the owners of the trademark, then they should be able to apply as joint
applicants.
A
separate agreement between the individual band members should be executed
concerning the disposition of the trademark rights should one or more members
of the group leave or should the group be reconstituted, since the failure to
do so may result in dire consequences should one or more of the band members
depart or strike out on their own under the same name. In one dispute a court
held that a musical group's manager and promoter owned the group's name since
he "exerted influence over the style and content of the group’s act" and
"functioned much like the producer of a theater company."
[5]
In another fairly well-known case, the name Fleetwood Mac was the subject of
litigation when the group experienced internal problems which forced it to cut
short its tour. Afterward, the band's manager, assembled a new band under the
name Fleetwood Mac to complete the tour, even though no original group members
were involved. The original group commenced an action to stop the new group
from performing under the name and the court granted an injunction. This could
have been avoided had appropriate agreements been in place.
Likewise,
in a recent decision, the widow of the original manager of The Drifters, after
over 30 years of dispute, successfully enjoined several former members of the
group from using the Drifters mark, even though the former members had
originally signed an agreement surrendering rights in the name.
[6]
A recent decision has also held that a former band member may legitimately use
his former band’s name in promotional materials, in this case, Nicholas
Kassbaum, formerly of Steppenwolf, was allowed to refer to himself as
“Formerly of Steppenwolf”, and an “Original (Founding) Member
of Steppenwolf” when performing with his new group.
[7] 2. Basis for the application Another
threshold issue is has the mark been used or will the mark be used in
interstate or international commerce? If the trademark is used only locally,
such as a band performing only in Wichita, Kansas, and there is no intention to
use the mark outside of that locality, then it may not be possible to obtain a
federal trademark registration, since only marks that have been or will be used
in interstate or international commerce are eligible for registration on the US
Federal Register. In this case, it may be prudent to consider simply obtaining
a state registration for the trademark, at least so that the public is put on
notice that someone claims rights in the mark. State registrations are
relatively simple and inexpensive to obtain. However, if a trademark is
eligible for federal registration, state registrations are unnecessary and not
cost-effective since they do not generally provide substantive rights, but only
serve to put third parties on notice of the trademark claim.
If
a mark is already in use, then an application based on such use may be filed.
If the mark has not yet been used, the applicant may apply based on a
bona
fide
intention to use the mark in commerce. Special rules may apply to trademark
owners whose trademark rights originate in other countries.
3. What goods or services are involved? It
is also important to know on which goods and services the mark has been or will
be used. The USPTO requires that the application specify the goods or services
on or in connection with which an applicant uses, or has a
bona
fide
intention to use, the mark in commerce. This means that the goods and services
must be identified in an explicit manner and must specify the "particular"
goods or services as clearly, accurately and as concisely as possible. The
USPTO will reject an overbroad or ambiguous specification of goods. For
example, if the mark has only been used on "t-shirts", a specification for
"clothing" will be rejected as overbroad. In addition, once filed, a
specification of goods may be clarified or restricted, but not expanded.
Since
the United States employs a classification system for goods and services, in
accordance with the International Classification system of 34 classes of goods
and 8 classes of services, once the goods and services of interest are
identified, they must be classified. In the music industry, the most often
used classes of goods and services are International Class 9, which covers
recordings, International Class 16, which covers paper products and printed
matter, International Class 25, which covers articles of clothing, and
International Class 41, which covers entertainment services. Other related
classes of interest may include International Class 14, which covers jewelry,
International Class 18 which covers leather goods and bags, International Class
38 which covers broadcasting services as well as on-line chat room services,
and International Class 35 which covers artist management, public relations,
electronic retailing and advertising services. However, a potential
merchandising program may include even more classes, if it involves goods such
as cosmetics, fragrances or cleaning products which fall in Class 3, candles
which fall in Class 4, metal key chains which fall in Class 6, tableware which
falls in Class 8, picture frames and non-metal key rings which fall in Class
20, beverageware and lunch boxes which fall in Class 21, bed, bath and table
linens which fall in Class 24, or even toys and games in Class 28.
4. Other requirements If
an application is based on use in commerce, the application must identify the
specific goods on which the mark has been used and, with respect to each
category of goods or services, to identify the date of first use in commerce in
or with the United States and the type of commerce involved; to provide the
date of earliest use anywhere; to indicate the mode or manner in which the mark
is used; and to provide specimens showing the trademark used in the form filed
in the application for each class of products.
Once
this information is available, the application form, containing a verification
or declaration attesting to the facts and allegations concerning use, must be
completed and properly signed by the applicant, a member of the applicant firm,
or an officer of the applicant corporation or association. In addition, a
person appointed by a power of attorney may also sign such documents.
[5]
Rick v. Buchansky, 609 F. Supp. 1522 (S.D.N.Y. 1985),
dismissed
without op.,
770 F.2d 157 (2d Cir. 1985).
[6]
Marshak v. Treadwell, 240 F.3d 184 (3d Cir. 2001).
[7]
Kassbaum v. Steppenwolf Productions Inc., 236 F3d 487 (9th
Cir. 2000).
|
![]() |
[Home] [About Ladas
& Parry LLP] [Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain
Names & E-Commerce] [Patents &
Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP
Rights Maintenance] [IP as Property]
[News & Bulletins]
© Copyright 2001 Dennis S. Prahl - Posted July 2002
Please read our disclaimer.