|
Petty Patent Protection By
John Richards
[1]
Introduction
Historical Background The Current Situation Worldwide "Philosophical" Reasons for the Need for a Utility Model System Proposals in Europe Conclusion Introduction The
term "petty patent" is no longer actually used anywhere in the world, its use
in Australia having been superseded by the term “innovation patent”
in 2001.
[2]
Recently, however, the term has acquired a secondary meaning, namely any type
of protection that is provided for inventions that do not qualify for full
patent protection. By far the best known of these are utility models, although
other terms such as utility innovations, utility solutions and short term
patents are used in some countries.
[3]
Until just over
a decade ago, an utility model protection was regarded as being something
of a curiosity in the intellectual property world. It is true that the Washington
revision of the Paris Convention in 1910 had recognized Utility Models as
a species of industrial property right, but in his 1975 book "National and
International Protection of Patents, Trademarks and Related Rights," Dr.
Stephen Ladas listed as having this form of protection only in Brazil, Germany,
Italy, Japan, The Philippines, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Spain and Taiwan.
Since then, however, many countries have adopted protection of this type
or some other form of "second tier" protection for useful articles or other
"low grade" inventions and in the past decade alone over a dozen countries
have added legislation providing for protection of this type to their national
laws. In Europe, the European Commission has issued a proposed directive
on protection of inventions by utility models. [1]
This
is an updated version of a paper first published in the Proceedings of the Fordham
University School of Law International Intellectual Property Law and Policy
Conference 1995 (Juris Publishing and Sweet & Maxwell, 1998).
Copyright John Richards 2002.
[2]
Petty
patents were in fact rarely used in Australia. Their only advantage was that
only publications or acts within Australia were considered when assessing
novelty. However, the other standards that had to be met were the same as those
for ordinary patents and petty patents lasted only for six years. The new
innovation patent is intended to be more useful for small enterprises in that
the standard of inventiveness required is lower than that required for ordinary
patents (what is required is an innovation that makes a “substantial
contribution to the art” - there is no need for it to be non-obvious. The
term is now eight years.
[3]
In
addition to patent-type systems, it should be borne in mind that protection for
some forms of this type of innovation may also be protectable in other ways. For example, in countries such as France, design
protection can be secured for functional articles and, in certain other countries in Continental Europe, protection against
"slavish imitation" is provided by marketing laws.
|
|
[Home] [About Ladas
& Parry LLP] [Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain
Names & E-Commerce] [Patents &
Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP
Rights Maintenance] [IP as Property]
[News & Bulletins]
© Copyright 2002 John Richards - Posted July 2002
Please read our disclaimer.