![]() |
Patents / Biotechnology / US Biotechnology Practice |
|
8 Infringement As
with our consideration if novelty and obviousness, we will confine our
discussion to aspects of U.S. law that may differ from what is common in other
parts of the world.
35
USC § 271 gives a patentee
[180]
the right to bring an action both for
direct
infringement
against anyone who within the United States makes, uses, offers to sell or
sells any patented invention within the United States or who imports a patented
invention into the United States or who carries out certain other acts
discussed below and for
indirect
infringement
against anyone who actively
induces
an act of infringement of such an invention or who
contributes
to infringement by selling a component of a patented machine, manufacture,
combination or composition or a material for use in practicing a patented
process. The statute specifically states that offers for sale are
infringements only if the sale that is offered will occur before the expiration
of the patent.
[181]
Certain specific provisions also apply for infringement of patents relating 1)
to the export from the United States of "all or a substantial portion" of the
components of a patented invention in "such manner as to actively induce" their
combination outside the United States; 2) to import of products into the United
States of products made abroad which had they been made in the United States
would have been an infringement of a United States patent; 3) to drugs so that
testing required to enable filing of an application for marketing approval with
the FDA is not itself an infringement, although the filing of application for
marketing approval itself is an act of infringement if the purpose of the
filing is to engage in commercial exploitation of the invention before the
expiration of the patent and 4) to patents relating to medical processes.
[180]
Infringement actions may also be brought by someone holding an exclusive
license under a patent.
Littlefield
v. Perry, 88 U.S. 205 (1875). For a discussion of the situations in which someone other
than the patentee may sue for infringement and the situations where the
patentee is a necessary party, see
Intellectual Property Development Inc. v. TCI Cablevision of California Inc.,
58 USPQ2d 1681 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
|
![]() |
![]() |
[Home] [About Ladas & Parry LLP]
[Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain Names
& E-Commerce] [Patents & Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP Rights
Maintenance] [IP as Property] [News
& Bulletins]
© Copyright 2002 John Richards - Posted July 2002
Please read our disclaimer.