![]() |
Patents / Biotechnology / US Biotechnology Practice |
|
6.3 The Effect of a Prior U.S. Application or PCT Application designating the United States As
amended by the 1999 law changes which became effective on November 29, 2000, 35
USC § 102(e) bars the grant of a patent if the invention was described in:
(1)
an application for patent published under [the new “18 month
publication” provision] by another filed in the United States before the
invention by the applicant for patent, except that an international application
filed under the [PCT] shall have the effect under this subsection of a
[published] national application ... only if the international application
designating the United States was published ... in the English language; or The
new text apparently applies only to patents issued on applications filed on or
after November 29, 2000 or earlier filed applications that were published
voluntarily. For older patents and applications, the old law continues to
apply. This reads as follows: the invention was described in a patent granted on an application for a patent by another filed in the United States before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or on an international application by another who has fulfilled the requirements [for entry into the United States under the PCT] before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent. It
should be noted that despite the general rule that an international application
filed under the PCT has effect as a national application as of its
international filing date, this does not apply to this section. Under the
pre-November 2000 law a PCT application that gave rise to a U.S. Patent was
effective as of the date on which national phase entry was completed. Under the
new law, a PCT application published in English and designating the United
States is effective in the same way as a published U.S. application. However, a
U.S. Patent issued directly from a PCT application will no longer be effective
as prior art against a later filed application of another unless the PCT
publication of the application was in English.
[124] [124]
The USPTO published Examination Guidelines for 35 USC § 102(e)(2) in the
Official Gazette of February 27, 2001 giving examples as to where there was or
was not a change of effective prior art date as a result of the changes in the
law. On its web site, the USPTO has commented on the change that
“patent application publications may be used as prior art under 35 USC §
102(e) in applications filed on or after November 29, 2000, and in applications
that filed before November 29, 2000 that are voluntarily published under 35
USC § 122(b). Applicants will be able to defeat the patents of others without
recourse to the harsh and comparatively more expensive provisions of a
statutory invention registration (35 USC § 157), and ensure that inventions
that they choose not to patent are not patented by others.”
|
![]() |
![]() |
[Home] [About Ladas & Parry LLP]
[Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain Names
& E-Commerce] [Patents & Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP Rights
Maintenance] [IP as Property] [News
& Bulletins]
© Copyright 2002 John Richards - Posted July 2002
Please read our disclaimer.