Domain Names E-CommercePatentsLitigationIP Rights MaintenanceIP as PropertyNews & BulletinsTrademarksAbout UsHistoryEmployment OpportunitiesL&P Professionals
HomeAbout UsContact UsSearchQuick Search:

Ladas & Parry Firm News

Firefighting and Intellectual Property


By John Richards [1]

Del Goldsmith retired as a partner of Ladas & Parry quite a number of years ago. Until rather recently, Del would still show up at our New York office and practice his chosen profession of being a patent lawyer. To us, Del is a well-loved colleague. To the people of Patterson, New York, however, one of his claims to fame is as a member of the Fire Department (he is still a member of the Fire Police). When talking with Del, it is difficult to determine which is his greater interest: intellectual property or the fighting of fires. In this paper, we shall try to bring the two together.

Organized fire fighting antedates any intellectual property right, unless that is one accepts the idea that Greco-Roman makers marks were a form of trademark or copyright claim, but there is little support for this view. About 2,000 years ago Caius Julius Caesar Octavianus, better known by his title as princeps: Augustus, instituted a fire-fighting cohort in Rome under a praefectus vigilum. The cohort was equipped with apparatus for spraying water on to a fire based on force pumps that had been invented 300 years earlier by Ctesibus in Alexandria. After the fall of the Roman Empire, technology levels fell so that by the time of William the Conqueror all that was available was a simple bucket and a metal sheet with which one was required to cover one's domestic fires each night on the tolling of the curfew (“couvre feu”) bell.

Further technical progress did not come until sixteenth century Portugal where there was introduced a new device known as a water squirt. This was essentially a large syringe, about one meter long, which could be filled with water and squirted on to the fire. Three men were needed to operate it. In 1518, Blattner in Augsberg developed a mobile version mounted on a wheeled carriage. However, such devices still left much to be desired.

The first major breakthrough came in the 1670's with the invention of the so-called Dutch engine by van der Heiden of Amsterdam. His revolutionary step was the use of leather hosepipes and couplings to join lengths of hose together to enable water to be directed on to the fire in a continuous stream. He also devised means to suck water from the canals to be used in his engine and wrote the first book, entitled Slang-Brand-Spuiten, on fire fighting. For all this he was awarded the right to be the exclusive producer of engines of this type for a twenty-five year period. Similarly, in 1699, Louis XIV awarded a period of exclusivity to Du Mourier and Du Perrier for their portable fire-fighting pump.

In 1721, Richard Newsham obtained an English patent [2] for a “New Water Engine for Quenching and Extinguishing fiers” (sic). In these machines, pistons in the squirting chambers were operated by a chain running over toothed quadrants that were rocked up and down by pumping levers. A further patent on an improved version followed in 1725. [3] It is claimed that one version of this machine could pump 160 gallons of water in one minute to a height of 165 feet. From 10 to 20 men were required to act as pumpers on the leavers and the traditional chant to maintain the rhythm was “beer-oh, beer-oh”, passers by being pressed into service and supplied with free beer for their pains. (Whether this is the source of the traditional British objection to a patent claim that claimed a solution to a known problem without defining the means used as a “free beer claim” is open to conjecture.)

Some of Mr. Newsham's engine designs still exist and can be seen at the Hall of Flame Museum of Firefighting in Phoenix. Arizona.

Somewhat surprisingly, throughout most of the 18th century, fire engines continued to have to be manhandled to the site of a fire. It was only in the 1790's that Charles Simpkin obtained patents on improvements that enabled engines to be horse drawn, notably a steerable fore carriage and introduction of road springs. He also obtained a patent for replacement of leather valves that had been used previously by metal ones.

The ability to reach the site of a fire relatively quickly led to the one major link between the history of fire fighting and trademarks. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, insurance had become big business and insurance against losses caused by fire became possible. Each insurance company had a clear incentive to minimize the loss on any property it insured. Thus, they formed their own fire fighting units. However, they did not wish to waste their time fighting fires on which some other insurer would bear the loss. Therefore, it became a requirement that properties insured by a particular insurance carrier displayed that company's brand mark. Such marks may be seen outside some buildings to this day.

The next major step forward was the application of steam power to the fighting of fires. This took hold relatively slowly. Watt's steam engine, adding a separate condenser to Newcomen's design, had been patented in 1769 [4] and his double acting engine in 1782. [5] The first steam locomotive was patented by Tevethick in 1802 [6] and there had been extensive litigation about Fulton's steamboat patents in the United States [7], long before Braithwaite and Ericsson [8] came up with the first steam fire engine in 1828. The boiler took twenty minutes to heat up but once it got going it could pump water at a rate of 150 gallons per minute to a height of 90 feet. Firemen did not like it. They said it was too powerful and used up too much water.

The first New York steam fire engine of Hodge in 1840 was an advance over that of Braithwaite and Ericsson in that it not only used steam power for pumping water but also for propulsion of the engine. Unfortunately it still needed horses to maneuver. It met a similar fate to the Braithwaite and Ericsson machine. As late as 1877, patents were still being granted for what were in effect hand pumped machines, one to Levi Taylor [9] being directed to “the peculiar construction and arrangement of the brake lever, cylinders and piston rods with respect to each other, whereby a greatly increased leverage and corresponding power is secured”. A little earlier W. F. Padwick [10] had patented a dual-purpose machine for “damping and powdering turnip plants etc” which could be adapted to fire fighting use by attaching a hose. A patent to F. Fowke focused on the connection of the pistons of the pumps to the working handles. [11]

In 1859, there was finally produced an engine, dubbed “the steam elephant” that did everything by steam and could be steered without the need for horses. [12] An improved machine having the same abilities followed in 1861. [13] Unfortunately, the enthusiasm for developing steam propulsion in the United Kingdom was then severely dampened by the Locomotive Act of 1861, which required that all self-propelled vehicles be preceded by a man walking with a red flag. There were no special provisions for emergency vehicles in those days.



For much of the rest of the nineteenth century most developments were in the United States, many of them by Truchson La France either while he was with the Elmira Union Iron Works or later after he formed his own company. [14] In 1872, in a patent which is of interest in its use of disclaiming language in the introduction to the claim, Albert F. Allen claimed a means for reducing the weight of fire engines to avoid the need for a cast iron bed for the boiler etc. [15] His design utilized a "hollow metallic bed, which is divided into two or more separate chambers, which communicate, resepctively, with the induction and eduction sides of the pump...." His design can be seen to the right. In 1882, B. J. C Howe patented the replacement of reciprocating pumps by rotary pumps in a “horse-power fire-engine”. [16]








One of the major late nineteenth century developments was the introduction of the telescopic ladder in the mid to late 1800's. An example of an "Improved Fireman's Extension Ladder" can be seen in U.S. Patent 79768 of July 7, 1868 to the left. This patent ws issued to Mr. Robert H. Jones of San Francisco, California. Mr. Jones' ladder could be maneuvered next to a "lofty" building and an horizontal platform at its upper end could be used to aid the escape of persons in the building. Later came the introduction of the first turntable ladders by Magirus in 1892. [17]



Another topic favored by American inventors in the late nineteenth century was to the long term benefit of the canine population, namely the development of fire hydrants, the problem of preventing frost damage having been a major concern in their design form an early stage, as is exemplified by the patent of R. T. H. Stileman [18], which can be seen to the right.

Necessity is said to be the mother of invention and so it was in the development of propulsion means for fire engines. Unlike large city departments, small fire departments could not afford to keep teams of horses on hand just in case there was a fire and equipment was already too large for the eighteenth century approach of man-handling the equipment to the site of the fire. The only alternative was some form of self-propulsion. An 1891 British Patent described electrically propelled fire engines, but the idea does not seem to have achieved commercial success. [19] Then, in 1898, the French firm of Cambier et Cie produced the first fire engine that used internal combustion engines both for propulsion of the vehicle and for driving the pumps. [20] (Interestingly Daimler had patented the use of the internal combustion engine in a fire engine nine years earlier, but only for driving the pumps, the equipment was still horse drawn.) The application of the use of motor power to elevate a ladder followed in equipment built in England by the Merryweather Company for use in Shanghai. The application of hydraulics to this problem followed in a design by Tupper (chief fire officer of Engine, Myanamar) in 1924.

USP 4875526 In recent years, the focus of attention has turned to chemical methods for fighting fires. [21] In the 1920’s, Merryweather introduced fire suds engine in which chemical solutions were kept in two separate tanks with separate hoses that fed to the same nozzle where the chemicals mixed to produce suds. In the last twenty years, a wide variety of chemicals has been suggested as being useful in firefighting in the patent literature [22]. Other recent preoccupations include special techniques for down hole fires in oil wells, or in use of airborne equipment for dealing with forest fires. However, inventions can still be made in more traditional areas, such as U.S. Patent 4875526 (seen to the right), which addresses the age old problem of how to carry water to the site of a fire when it is far from a water supply, and U. S. Patent 4488603, which provides a compact and highly mobile fire fighting vehicle to deal with the same problem that caused horses to be required by the first steam fire engines, namely, how to maneuver the equipment close to a fire.



[1] The author wishes to thank his colleagues Iain C. Baillie, Janet I. Cord and Steven Fischman and his wife Becca Earley Richards for much of the research on which this paper is based.
[2] Patent No 439, a copy of which appears as an appendix to this paper.
[3] Patent 479.
[4] British Patent 913 (1769).
[5] British Patent 1321 (1782).
[6] British Patent 2599.
[7] A New York State Patent of March 19, 1787 (prior to the adoption in September 1787 of the Constitution of the United States giving the federal government authority in patent matters) granted a monopoly of making and using boats propelled by fire and steam. The patent was extended for a further twenty years by the state legislature in 1803 and the subject of the case of Livingstone and Fulton v. Van Ingen (1812) 9 Johns. 507.
[8] Ericsson was at the time living in London; he later moved to the United States where he was the designer of the USS Monitor.
[9] U. S. Patent 195183 of September 11, 1877.
[10] British Patent No 1887 of 1858.
[11] British Patent 2090 of 1858.
[12] This was produced by James Tyler of Birkenhead in England. In the same year, British Patent 2614 to J Willcock (based on a communication from J. G. E. Larned) was directed to a fire engine “in which the steam engine operating the pumps is adapted to propel the vehicle when required.”
[13] By William Roberts of London 1861.
[14] See, for example, U. S. Patent Nos. 231336 of August 17, 1880; 149664 of April 14, 1874; 478439 of July 5 1892; 487124 of November 29, 1892 and 526975 of October 2, 1894.
[15] U. S. Patent 132426. The claim language, including the disclaimer reads: “I am aware that hollow beds for steam fire engines are not new - that they have heretofore been made with the interior chamber connecting direct with the education side of the pump; but the induction-chamber of the pumps in said engines have always been connected to the front part of the bed by separate curved pipes outside of and below the bed, and I do not, broadly, claim the hollow bed; but I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent- The combination, within the hollow metallic bed of a steam fire engine, of the induction chamber and the education-chamber, which are arranged to directly communicate, respectively, with the suction and discharge chambers of the pump, as and for the purposes specified”.
[16] U.S. Patent 262196. It is interesting to note that, even this late, horses were still being used to provide the motive power for the pumps in a manner reminiscent of the techniques used in the Middle East to use animals to pump water from a well.
[17] Magirus also introduced the first steel turntable in 1931. Early proposals for turntable ladders can be found in U. S. Patent Nos. 336519 (W. F. Hyde) and 336512 (L. E. Curtis) both of February 16, 1886.
[18] See, for example, U. S. Patent 166904 of 1875 to R. T. H. Stileman or a 1888 U. S. Patent to C. G. Ette.
[19] British Patent 20913 of 1891 to M. W. Davey.
[20] J. C. Merryweather, a major contributor to English fire engine development introduced its Fire King design in which the steam engine used for the pumps could also be used for propulsion in 1900. However, it was about to be overtaken by technological advances and within five years had obtained patent 1805 of 1905 on converting steam propelled fire engines into oil driven ones by removing the front wheels and fore carriage and replacing them by a frame carrying a steering wheel and an internal combustion engine. Patent No 10082 of the same year to J. C. Hudson was directed to an engine having both “suitable quick starting motor” and a “quick steaming pump and boiler”.
[21] An early example of a chemical approach can be found in British patent 305 of 1870, which described a generator for producing and forcing “carbonic acid solution” for use as a fire “extincter”. U. S. Patent 829629 (Thomas Cochrane) of August 28 1906 combined a chemical approach with the use of the internal combustion engine to provide the means of locomotion. His machine comprised “a cask or receiver adapted to contain an alkaline solution and a bottle or similar fragile receptacle containing acid and adapted to be broken for mixing the ingredients and generating the necessary pressure to expel the contents of the extinguisher”.
[22] See, for example, U. S. Patents 5304313 (surfactants combined with certain phosphates), 5218021 (perfluoroalkyl terminated co-oligomer concentrates and polysaccharides), 4968441 (crushed glass bearing a hydrophobic coating), 4859349 (polysaccharide/perfluroralkyl complexes), 3360480 (protein hydrolyzate compositions containing perfluproalkyl sulfide terminated oligomers), 4439329 (hydrocarbyl sulfide terminated oligomer foam stabilizers), 4390069 (trifluorobromomethane).

 

Contact Us


[Home] [About Ladas & Parry LLP] [Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain Names & E-Commerce] [Patents & Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP Rights Maintenance] [IP as Property] [News & Bulletins]

© Copyright 2002 Ladas & Parry
Please read our disclaimer.