Newsletters and Bulletins / May 2002 / United States |
|
United States - Separating Goodwill from Intellectual Property Since
1973, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has been designated as
the organization in the private sector for establishing standards of financial
accounting and reporting. These standards govern the preparation of financial
reports.
In
July 2001, the FASB approved new accounting standards that have significant
consequences for the valuation of a company’s goodwill and other
intangible assets such as intellectual property. Specifically, FASB Accounting
Statement 141 (Business Combinations) eliminates the pooling of interest method
for booking mergers. FASB Accounting Statement 142 (Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets) alters the bookkeeping for goodwill and intangible assets.
The
new standards underscore the importance of intellectual property assets in
general, and more specifically in the acquisition process. In the past,
companies simply aggregated goodwill and other intangibles into one line item
and amortized it all together. Therefore, there was little need to carefully
assess the actual value of intellectual property assets. Going forward,
however, a company is required to identify patents, trademarks, trade secrets,
licensing agreements and other intellectual property as intangible assets,
separate and apart from its goodwill. While goodwill will no longer be
amortized, certain intangibles must be.
For
a company that considers its intellectual property to be a valuable asset, it
is imperative that it accurately report its value. Many companies, however, may
not be prepared to provide precise accounting of their intellectual property
assets. At a minimum, a company must identify and index its intellectual
property assets, outline a strategy to exploit the value of the assets and then
begin the process of assigning value to each asset.
Failure
to value intellectual property assets properly has its consequences. For
example, a company might want to undervalue its intellectual property assets as
a means of avoiding amortization in connection with an acquisition, but
undervaluing the assets could trigger an investigation by the SEC or limit a
company’s ability to recover damages in the event of a future
infringement or dilution litigation.
While
it is too soon to predict all the consequences of the new accounting standards,
it is already apparent that the new standards will require companies to address
the increasing importance of their intellectual property assets.
|
[Home] [About Ladas & Parry LLP]
[Contact Us] [Search]
[Trademarks] [Domain Names
& E-Commerce] [Patents & Copyrights]
[Litigation] [IP Rights
Maintenance] [IP as Property] [News
& Bulletins]
© Copyright 2002 Ladas & Parry - Posted May 2002
Please read our disclaimer.